-
How do you optimize for Claude Search?
Posted by on May 16, 2026 at 10:46 amMy site ranks number #1 for the typical LLM queries (“Best x for y 2026”) and 7 of the top 10 SERP results list my product as the number #1 choice. These ranks are the same on Google, Perplexity, Bing, Brave and DuckDuckGo.
ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok always recommend my product. Yet, I’m invisible to Claude. It always recommends some dumb product from this tiny site that’s technically owned by the same company as the product.
This doesn’t matter for traffic, but it does matter if other people write similar roundup blog posts with Claude and never mention my product.
Model doesn’t matter, all anthropic products ignore me.
Does anyone know how to optimize for Claude specifically?
-
1 Reply
-
Ask Claude how it came to its conclusion. You can see what searches it did. You need to show up in those searches.
-
[removed]
-
Is Claude accessing your document on the search it does? Is it skipping it for some reason? Is it reading it, but finding the information not reliable?
-
Claude’s citation behavior is genuinely different from ChatGPT and Gemini, it tends to be more conservative and pulls from a narrower set of sources. The most common reason I see for a site that ranks well everywhere else getting ignored by Claude is that Claude is more reliant on structured, extractable content from domains it considers authoritative, and it has a stronger preference for content that includes explicit comparison frameworks (tables, pros/cons, verdicts) rather than narrative roundups.
If your site ranks #1 on Perplexity and ChatGPT, you likely have good content and schema. But Claude may be drawing from a different training data snapshot or weighting citation sources differently, it is known to favor Wikipedia, established media, and domains with very clean structured data over newer or niche sites, even if those sites have strong topical authority elsewhere.
One thing worth checking: whether Claude is citing a specific competitor’s domain that has a Wikipedia entry or a G2 profile with high review volume. Those signals carry disproportionate weight in Claude’s responses compared to ChatGPT. If that tiny site is owned by the same company, it might have a Wikipedia page or a long-standing domain history that Claude’s model treats as more authoritative.
The fix that has worked for people I have talked to is not more content, it is getting your domain cited on the sources Claude actually pulls from. A Wikipedia entry if you qualify, or getting mentioned in a Wirecutter/CNET-style comparison that Claude indexes, tends to move the needle more than optimizing your own pages.
-
Top resources for quotes are often capterra, g2 and reddit. You can expand your presence there to be seen on LLMs in general.
-
[removed]
-
Claude is kind of the black box right now tbh. A lot of people are seeing the same thing where Anthropic models seem to overweight certain smaller “review” sites or tightly connected entity relationships instead of pure SERP dominance. Feels less like traditional SEO and more like “what sources exist consistently in its training + retrieval layer.”
I’d probably look at entity consistency first. Same product naming everywhere, strong comparisons pages, clean schema, citations from niche sites, Reddit mentions, GitHub/docs references if relevant, and making sure your brand gets mentioned in contexts outside affiliate roundups. Weirdly, Claude also seems to latch onto concise opinionated content more than giant SEO pages.
Log in to reply.