Do AI written articles get penalised? Human vs AI articles which one ranks better on google?

[hellorenn]

AI content doesn’t get penalized by default. Low-quality content does.

If AI articles weren’t ranking for you, it’s usually because they were too generic or didn’t add anything new. Google is getting better at spotting that, regardless of who wrote it.

Human vs AI isn’t really the right comparison anymore. It’s useful vs not useful.

AI works fine for drafting, but it needs editing, real insights, and better structure to compete. Pure AI output tends to feel thin, which is why it struggles.

If you want AI content to rank, treat it as a starting point, not the final version.

[i_am_carver]

Are you not manually submitting your content to GSC once you’ve made posted it?

I use AI a lot these days, granted I have a good idea what the content should look like, and it’s clear that when it doesn’t rank well, the content I put together with the help of AI just wasn’t strong enough or someone else’s content was stronger.

Otherwise, I’ve ranked plenty of AI content, some immediately taking off and generating engagement within a week.

But if you’re not manually submitting your content to GSC and just waiting for them to stumble upon it, you’re doing it inefficiently.

[0_2_Hero]

AI has nothing to do with it. If it’s good content, it’s good content.

Problem is AI doesn’t write good content

[[deleted]]

[removed]

[[deleted]]

[removed]

[[deleted]]

[removed]

[[deleted]]

[removed]