-
What’s your experience with AI generated SEO content?
Hi, I’m NOT actually thinking of trying this, but I saw a thread on blackhatworld and thought the concept was interesting.
Has anyone here tried to rank a site with AI generated articles? How did it go?
-
16 Replies
-
Not so much AI but I used a script to scrape and spin an e-commerce website into existence from the uploaded affiliate .zip
It dynamically created pages with content/titles
It was amazing until I got greedy and added too much that and slowed down pageload speed
Was getting a lot of traffic for the more obscure things – entire site was in the “ar-lower reciver” parts niche.
This was in ~2016, 2017 so you’ll have to experiment if it’s as easy now.
-
It turned out great for him on the forum.
​
But Google knows how to do nothing until “they” learn, and I believe that almost nothing is done manually on their end anymore (except for the things which fund them, like AdSense). So Google AI which handles this just has to learn what this new thing is to know what to do about it – good or bad. AI is new, so their AI is learning about it, and will proceed afterwards, however they want.
​
If they decide it’s bad, he’s out for that site. Hope it works out well, though. For him.
-
I use spun and now AI content all the time. It works fine.I still have a site I made 8 months back that’s a one page Lorem ipsum site. It’s still indexed and ranked despite all the updates we’ve had since. Been using Conversion AI for a few weeks. Pretty impressive. Not 100% perfect but still effective.
-
I’ve been using a good bit of AI generated content. We don’t just use the AI and post. I have people editing what it spits out. It has sped up our content production.
-
It’s how you use it, moderate it and edit it.
I have watched a pro, who has been using an AI content for a while. He took a keyword mind map, and used the platform to expand just that into the majority of an article.
It wasn’t one click, but it was less labor intensive than raw writing and the outcome coupled with a handful of videos and images was nearly comparable to the competing posts for the keyword.
With something like editorninja or some other on demand copyproof editing you could have some high quality content for relatively little time or expense.
-
I am fascinated by this idea. 15 years ago they had spinners, but they sucked and Google blackhatted them
-
I’ve used it to help get past writers block or get started on an article. It does require a bit more editing than many would have you believe. To me, it still seems a ways away from being the constant go-to.
-
It is great to produce filler content for PBN’s, web 2.0’s and tier 2 and 3 articles. It does save you a lot of time.
-
Do it daily. Using Frase, Market Muse, Outranking.io, Conversion.io and some others. Works well and rnaks well. But as someone else mentioned, it’s not 1 click, it rather make your job as an editor easier by scraping Serp for keywords to rank for, their cluster keyword categories, and allows you to auto spin/rewrite other people’s content into something original. Defo saves me heaps of time and quality of the content has improved.
-
So what I’m hearing is this is actually a useful tool. Today I learned!
-
Six months ago I would have told you to stay away from “AI written content” unless you want to tank your site. I would have also told you that good content is for users and not particularly relevant for ranking. Those two statements are not compatible if you think about it for a second.
So I tried it. The AI content is not nearly as bad as I anticipated. If I had to describe it, it’s very similar to what you would get from someone whose first language is not English, but they are close to fluent.
So here’s how we use it –
1. If the content is meant for users – we start with the AI article and have one of our writers clean it up.
2. If the content is meant for Google – we use it as is, no need to clean it.
It’s a huge time saver.
-
I use conversion.ai, beats the others hands down.
If anyone wants 5000 free credits to try it, message me for the affiliate link – you don’t have to buy it but you can use the credits
-
I was both impressed and unimpressed. Impressed that AI can write in complete sentences, unimpressed with quality and originality of the product. I feel like Google is going to detect spammy AI content before AI learns how to truly sound human. To me, using AI content is the same as copying what your competitors are doing in hopes of outranking them which limits yourself to your competition.
I write 100% original content which is why I still get inquiries from articles I wrote 5 years ago that are buried under new content and site owners. AI is great for short term gains maybe but not a sustainable solution in my opinion even if you’re cleaning up the copy it’s not truly original work.
-
I use copy.ai which is great. I regualarly produced 1200 word content which nicely rank on my keywords. It needs editing, but i wouldn’t be able to write those posts without it. The copy.ai has unlimited use without any credits, so I can play with this for hours. They evolving constantly, and currently I’m a beta tester for new features, such as long form blog posts. My workflow is: I use blogely app to check serps, get ideas and build outline then I produce post in copy.ai and then editing with grammarly. The post are at least 95% unique and ranking nicely in my niche (even got feature snipped on some). English is not my first language and I’m very gratefull for what GPT-3 offers.
-
Following closely. Each one I have experimented with has been so far from usable content that I’ve given up. I do like the idea of using it as a supporting tool for real writers.
Log in to reply.