-
What is the best AI Writer of 2023?
-
My experience any AI writer is only as good as what you put in as a prompt. To get you the best results so far Chat GPT 4 once you master the prompts it can put out some really good stuff.
-
Google has made it quite clear as long as your not spamming AI content to manipulate the search engines AI content is okay. Sometimes when you try to get it that so that it’s not detectable it ends up lowering the quality of the content. Chat GPT for the most part rights. Really good content if you know how to write the prompts correctly. The thing you need to watch out for is plagiarism. Which really good prompts I’ve seen chat GPT write better content than most content writers. It’s all about writing useful content.
-
I like koala. Produces an editable outline, keeps a history of all your interactions and comes with a chatbot.
-
ContentatScale does the most flawlessly with the least effort but it’s costs a fortune. If you want fast high quality at scale, look no further. SurgeGraph is the best all in one and SEO detailed writer. Lastly #3 AgilityWriter and #4 Neuronwriter are good too.
-
For me, it’s ChatGPT.
Because I liked playing with prompting, I actually played with some wordplay, metrics, and excessive research….designed a prompt, and just use that now.
It passes AI Detection all the time.
I will say, it took a while to clear all detectors, since, we all know, there’s no real “detection” tools. They are as accurate as weather people predicting next week’s weather forecast.
It took a while, but it’s worth it, if you want to evade having to pay for Jasper, Rytr etc etc.
Or mix them up!
Either way, it’s a win win
-
I use chatGPT for outlines and silos then have TheZimmwriter create the content.
-
You really don’t have to worry if it’s AI written. As long as it’s written for people and not for search engines. It’s got to be content that adds value. As Google says useful content.
-
NotionAI? If you want to write blog, you can try the blog template of Quick Creator([quickcreator.io](https://quickcreator.io)).
-
But what you must watch out for is plagiarism. And make sure that it’s accurate. I would definitely not publish it directly to WordPress so I would not use a plugin. You can cut out a lot of the plagiarism if you add it to the prompt, but you still need to go through it. It also must be helpful content. Don’t just throw a bunch of junk out there.
-
I currently like WriteSonic and CopyAI for more in-depth articles if needed.
-
SurgeGraph for me. But one disclaimer, there’s no best AI writer, it all depends on your workflow, and surgegraph works the best for me.
-
SurgeGraph is the best for SEO content. Plans are pretty cheap, too
-
100% SurgeGraph, not sure if there’s anything that come close, at that price level, and that frequency of developer engagement + updates. Recently added auto-SEO optimization which is a blast.
-
SurgeGraph, cos high quality content, they use over 50+ SEO datapoints to generate my content. Also, latest feature is SEO auto optimize, which saves a lot of time, yet lets you customize lots of optimization things if you want to. Heard they are gonna release granular content control as well, not sure what it is yet but the dev team is awesome.
-
Positive letters? Or SEO content? LOL.
Having tried a lot of services that claim to write “plagiarism-free” or “undetectable as AI generated” content, they’re all trash.
Generally all they do is cobble together multiple GPT API services together, maybe run one or two of the crappy open source models they pulled off huggingface and use some library of pre-made prompts to summarize existing content, generate content off keywords, some web page, or scraped YT subtitles.
They pretty much all rely mainly on GPT3.5 or 4 then use the other models to either rewrite sentences/paragraphs, add in additional content as a mix-in, or both.
The results, from a readability standpoint were all worse than GPT4.
In terms of passing plagiarism checks, that’s easy and meaningless. It’s unlikely at this point that there’s enough ML generated content indexed in Google that the output of one of these systems will be a close match to something already out there.
As for passing checks to determine if the content was AI generated, this is where they fail. Many of these tools are outdated now but ones like [Originality.ai](https://Originality.ai) are pretty good and I’ve tested text generation tools that flat out guarantee to beat [Originality.ai](https://Originality.ai) but don’t, at least not by a tangible margin.
For example, 3 out of 4 generated articles would get a high “AI generated” score and the one which “passed” the check would get a 49% AI Generated/51% Human Generated score, which isn’t much of a win.
I also noticed that if I took the content that was just barely betting the AI detection and used a longer version of it, that 51% Human score would drop to like 1-2%. The longer the content, the easier it is to pick up the patterns that give it away as AI generated.
Now, here’s the bottom line though: Should you care if the content is detectable as AI generated if it’s good quality?
After all, Google says it doesn’t care how content is created as long as it’s good quality.
My take on this:
1. Google regularly lies about how they rank content. You’ll find a lot of successful, seasoned SEOs who will tell you to just do the opposite of what Google recommends.
2. Even if Google, for now, doesn’t care if content is AI generated, there’s no guaranteed that policy won’t change as tsunami of this content just keeps coming.
3. I’ve yet to see a text generating model that makes good content. Not passable content. Not surface-level summary type content. But in-depth, well written, well-structured content that you’d expect to have been written by an expert in the subject. None of them are capable of this yet. So if you do believe Google doesn’t care if it’s AI generated, only that it’s high quality, I don’t think you’ve covered your bases there.
4. Regardless of what Google says, backlinks are still king. You can rank any shit content for any keyword with enough good backlinks. So just be ready to get a good backlink profile if you want to rank your generated content. You might find some obscure no-competition keywords and ran temporarily for them with AI spam content but eventually 100 other people will generate content targeting those keywords and you’ll be dead in the water without those backlinks.Ah, but yes, you’re only writing “positive letters”. Either way, my suggestion would be to use GPT4 as a research assistant, look at the top ranking Google results for “positive letters” on the topic you’re writing on and use content from those to manually edit the GPT4 content.
If you want a fully automated way, expect mediocre results, which might be enough for your purposes if your audience isn’t too sharp. Just don’t expect to best good human writers.
Log in to reply.