-
Can anyone explain the logic of social media companies being held responsible for sextortion or cyberbullying?
I mean, I just want to give an example.
In the past, people would obviously use phones to call people, to threaten them, blackmail them, and so on, and there were obviously negative effects, but no-one ever said that the phone companies should be held responsible. So why is there this wave now against social media companies, that are expected to police speech (depending on country/location), and then also prevent or be held responsible for a host of negative effects of modern communication, such as blackmail, bullying, and other things.
I just don't understand the logic of it, so I was wondering if anyone had a great argument for why this is occuring.
Just recently read about lawsuits because of sextortion for example, in those cases the victim willingly bared themselves and sent pictures to the other person, that then blackmailed them, I just don't understand how that it Metas fault.
Log in to reply.