A few things – 1) this is blackhat and will be penalized and 2) you need to match the content with authority – its not an add on and 3) its not just that people are looking down on AI – its the problem of AI not being the research tool that people have convinced themselves it is.

Julian Goldie did a lot of videos about this over the past year and this clearly transgresses the Machine-Scaled Content spam policy.

Also, 4) can we stop perpetuating these myths, like this

>Make sure it exceeds 800+ words (as Google loves more content-friendly options) 

This is the word count myth – Google doesn’t have preferences. Yes, we know that between content writers charging per word and the content skyscraper theory and the fact you have more headings in long form content, plus the totally mediocre advice of averaging the top 3 articles, correlation as causation has convinced people that Google likes “longer content’ – Google has no preferences and content doesnt rank itself.

And this is content for manipulation of search

>For many people 100 searches might be small which I understand, ideally shoot for more but if you can rank 10 blogs number 1 at 100 searches a month that’s 1000 searches but yes you can shoot higher and its very possible as I have some ranking for 10,000+ searches a month 

And again, content doesnt rank itself – at least Juian’s guides paired it with backlinks – also spam though. But you can’t rank without earned or borrowed authority – which this statement unfortunately suggests.

> Content that ranks for highly searched industry-specific questions and if you’re really looking for some extra sauce throw some backlinks on there as well.