-
Social SEO killed my agency’s Google strategy and honestly, I’m not even mad about it
Three months ago, I ran an experiment that made me question everything I thought I knew about content distribution.
We manage social for 11 local businesses – restaurants, gyms, a few retail stores. Standard stuff. I'd been pushing them hard on the classic playbook: blog posts optimized for Google, backlinks, the whole SEO song and dance. Solid ROI, nothing crazy.
Then one of our restaurant clients got impatient. "Nobody's finding us on Google," they said. "But everyone's on TikTok looking for places to eat."
I was skeptical. But we ran a test. Took the same budget we'd been spending on blog content and Google Ads, redirected it entirely into TikTok and Instagram Reels. No website changes. No SEO. Just pure social content optimized for in-app search – proper captions, spoken keywords, trending sounds with our own spin.
Within six weeks, their weekend reservations were up 40%. Not from Google. From people searching "best pasta near me" directly in TikTok.
Here's what bothers me: I spent years learning traditional SEO. My whole value prop was built around Google rankings. And now I'm watching 24-year-olds who've never heard of meta descriptions crush it by understanding how TikTok's algorithm surfaces content in search results.
The uncomfortable truth? For local businesses targeting under-35s, traditional SEO might be a waste of money in 2026. These people aren't typing into Google anymore. They're asking TikTok, Instagram, even YouTube before they ever hit a browser.
Now I'm rebuilding everything I know. Learning caption optimization like it's 2015 keyword research all over again. Figuring out which hashtags actually get indexed vs. which ones are just engagement theater. Testing whether voiceovers with specific phrases impact discoverability more than on-screen text.
It's humbling. And honestly, a little exciting. But also terrifying, because if I'm wrong about this pivot, I just killed a revenue stream that was working fine.
Anyone else seeing this shift? Or am I overreacting to one lucky case study?
Log in to reply.