Official: How are you handling vaccine debates within your posts?

[AutoModerator]

[Please keep in mind that all posts need to be of professional discussion](https://www.reddit.com/r/socialmedia/comments/ft6ghx/all_new_posts_need_a_flair_going_forward/). This isn’t a help desk. [If this post doesn’t follow the rules report it to the mods](https://www.reddit.com/r/socialmedia/about/rules/).

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/socialmedia) if you have any questions or concerns.*

All new posts need a flair going forward
byu/JonODonovan insocialmedia

[ElGrandePeacock]

We delete misinformation and have updated our terms of use accordingly.

[calemedia]

Fake news can give your group a strike so it’s best to just delete anything that’s not from creditable sources

[alexnapierholland]

I don’t see any benefit to letting a debate about the efficacy of vaccines take place on a forum about interior design, or travel and tourism.

Immunology and virology are complex topics that get dealt with by highly-qualified industry professionals. And thanks to them, we finally have vaccines to tackle this pandemic.

There is no value, whatsoever, in giving some random Karen a platform to parrot worthless drivel that they heard on a YouTube video and cannot possibly challenge without laboratory equipment, or a detailed understanding of clinical testing.

Giving them space isn’t ‘facilitating free-thinking’.

It’s inviting someone to walk into your house and crap on the sofa.

[robeagray]

I’m currently getting together the most used words by such miss-informed people and adding them to my moderation banned words so they can’t get started. Shut that shit down. It’s not a debate for anywhere apart from a lab or medical setting.

[jaksevan]

I don’t bother let them die. This is evolution right before our eyes

[fooz42]

First conversation, warning. Usually the warning elicits a crazy response. Then, ban.