Does back-link relevancy matter a lot?

[Sk_Sabbir_Uddin]

Relevancy matters, but it’s not “only link from the exact same niche or it’s useless.” Google uses links as a signal for relevance and discovery, and the context around a link (page topic, placement, anchor, editorial intent) is a big part of whether it helps

Also, you don’t need competitors to link to you. Look for “adjacent” sites where your customers already are: suppliers, integrations, associations, local press, niche podcasts/newsletters, customer stories, and directories that real people use. Those tend to be both safer and more impactful long term.

[billhartzer]

If you’re going after local keywords in your city and it’s in the same city then it would be appropriate and help.

[BusyBusinessPromos]

Not for SEO itself. There are all types of relationships in the real world that exist when you think about it. Doctors and electricians restaurants and junk removal companies and so forth.

[useomnia]

Restaurant links can still be worth it, mostly for local credibility and real clicks, but they usually won’t be a big SEO win because they’re off-topic.

If the link exists because you traded something for it, it’s likely to get discounted. For SEO impact, aim for adjacent or local sites where the connection is natural, like suppliers, partners, associations, or local press.

[loaf-of-breddit]

In my experience and opinion: backlink topical relevance doesn’t matter at the page level. The page the backlink comes from doesn’t have to match your subject matter to help your target page.

What i think matters is:

1. the authority of the source page linking to you – basically who links to that page and whether the page gets organic clicks in Google Search will determine this.

The more clicks the source page gets, generally the more authority and value it’ll be able pass to you.

2. The link anchor text – this is where you can add a layer of context and topical relevance with a link. I dont think its about the topic of the page itself, it’s the actual link anchor text and possibly the surrounding content (say 50 words before / after the link placement) that pushes additional topical relevance along with authority.

This is an opinion / something I have observed doing SEO over the years.

Take with a grain of salt, correlation doesn’t equal causation and run your own scientific tests to form your own conclusions.

Cheers.

[WebLinkr]

# The backlink anchor text needs to be relevant, not the whole site, and it helps if the page has relevant topical authority.

But the site? No….thats beyond silly. Plus it would take an enourmous amount of research and subject matter expertise to sort, order and categorize the web.

>Would such back links have a real value, since restaurants have nothing in common with our field of business?

Who gets to decide how topics are related? For a start – PageRank is pre-LLM invention. Also, LLMs can only predict patterns they are given. Humans and experts constantly move topics in and out of categories.

So at what level and to what depth are things cateogorized?

And how can Google “own” this?

# Does Topical Authority matter?

Probably. But the idea the whole site must match is a recent fabriction

# Do your Research

Origin of the myth: PR and Backlink sales trying to cover for traffic

Source of Truth: The PageRank patent and follow up Google Docs

[Vinaya_Ghimire]

There are a couple of things you will have to consider while building backlinks. Relevancy is important, back links should come from the same niche. Authority matters. Backlinks should come from sites that have higher authority than yours.