-
Brand is the only moat AI can’t touch.
I've been running social media for a marketing agency and two other businesses for the past several months now. Staying consistent, building presence, posting even in stretches where nothing was working. And honestly there were plenty of times where I couldn't give a clean answer to why it mattered. Was it reach, visibility, top of funnel?
Read Gary Vaynerchuk's piece this week called "Social Media is Dead. Interest Media is Here." A lot of it covers ground you've probably seen before, but one specific argument he made literally made me think.
He pointed out that brand is the only moat left in an AI-commoditized world. This is how he explained it.
When someone types a generic query into an AI search, like "I want pizza," the algorithm decides the winner. Whoever the model picks gets the click. But when someone types "I want Pizza Hut," the algorithm doesn't get to vote. They already know who they want, hence the brand bypasses the algorithm entirely.
That framing hit differently than most marketing advice I've read because it explains something I couldn't articulate before. The risk isn't that AI gets better at surfacing results. The risk is that if no one knows your name, you're permanently at the mercy of whoever the model picks.
And that's a position you can't buy your way out of, quickly, at least. You either built the brand or you didn't.
I've been thinking about this in the context of the businesses I run social media for. The work isn't really about this month's impressions or this week's engagement. It's about whether someone a year from now types a generic search or types the name specifically. Those are two completely different outcomes and only one of them is in the algorithm's hands.
Idk how much this reframes anything for people already deep in brand building. But it did make the long game feel more concrete to me, at least.
Log in to reply.