Alternative platforms

[This_Opinion1550]

Try books

[GrowthZen]

If you want less spoonfed content and more control, there are really two evidence‑based paths: pick platforms with different incentive models, or build your own filters on top of the big ones.

a few data points to ground this:

yt and ig are deeply ad‑driven, and both explicitly optimize for watch time and engagement to maximize ad impressions, which is why feeds feel increasingly cluttered.

short‑form video now dominates attention on those platforms… shorts and reels get higher average completion rates and are heavily boosted in feeds, which makes it harder to surface niche long‑form or hidden content organically.

alternatives and workarounds that actually change the experience:

rss + open web: most major publishers, blogs, and even some yt channels still expose rss feeds. using an rss reader (feedly, inoreader, etc.) lets you build a fully customizable, largely ad‑free feed where you choose every source instead of an algorithm doing it for you. this is still how many journalists and researchers consume content.

fediverse / mastodon: mastodon doesn’t run a global engagement‑optimized algo at all. your timeline is chronological, and you can use lists, follows, and server choice to shape what you see. studies of federated platforms note that this local first design leads to less engagement bait and more community‑driven discovery, at the cost of less virality.

reddit, but curated: subreddits already act as topic‑level filter and then you can further customize by:
– subscribing only to niche, well‑moderated communities.
– sorting by ‘top’ over longer time windows (week/month/year) to surface the best content that would otherwise be buried in ‘hot’

research on social platforms shows that community‑curated ranking (upvotes within a niche group) tends to surface more relevant content than global, ad‑driven feeds.

if you care specifically about a customizable algo, your best bet in 2026 is to use the big platforms as databases (search, specific channels you follow), then layer your own algo on top using rss, saved searches, and niche communities, where you control the inputs instead of meta/google optimizing for ads.

so rather than looking for a perfect ig or yt replacement it’s much better to think in terms of a ‘stack’:
– chronological/community‑based feeds (mastodon, niche subreddits)
– personalized rss for long‑form and blogs
– search on yt/spotify/etc. only when you’re actively looking for something, not doom‑scrolling the ‘for you’ page

what kind of content are you mainly trying to discover (topics or formats)? that will change which combo makes the most sense.

[Present-Side-7195]

People keep asking for a platform with no algorithm, and I feel like I’m watching the internet reinvent the wheel in slow motion. That platform already exists. It’s basically MySpace, and it’s called SpaceHey. It was made by a college student in Germany specifically to preserve old skool MySpace culture. No algorithm deciding what you should care about. No engagement farming. No “suggested for you” nonsense. You see posts in chronological order like a civilized human. You can code your page for free. Customization is not stuck behind a paywall like other algorithmic platforms. You can customize everything. You have a Top 8. Music on profiles. No invisible gods shoving content in your face because it performed well with strangers. Is it perfect? No. Is it huge? Also no. That’s kind of the point. If what you actually want is a social space instead of a dopamine casino, it already exists. People just forgot how to exist online without being spoon fed. Sometimes the future looks a lot like the past….we just had to peel the algorithm off it.

[Gary_dubs_15]

The thing is most platforms rely on discovery algorithms. If you want control look at Substack for newsletters. That is pure curation. For video maybe Vimeo but it is much smaller. You have to build your own feed outside the big 2.

[carter_olivia]

explore thread, its a good platform to explore.